Bulgakov biography download

He, unlike Cronion, apparently, had the same literature teacher as mine. For each work, this teacher gave us under the record the only correct opinion and vision adopted. If any of the students, being asked, deviated from this opinion, never received above the three, after which the "teacher" once again repeated to everyone how to correctly interpret the work under discussion.

When they wrote works on what I read, I did not get out of the triples, and for a long time I could not understand what the reason was.

Then he noticed that the majority in their works stupidly retells the content of what he read in his own words, not making any comments and even more so conclusions. Then I also began to do this, and my performance immediately increased. I did not become an excellent student, because in my handwriting it was not visible that I was trying, but with a hard "good" - easy. So yes, teaching literature at school and the selection of works for him - there is also an instrument for imposing ideology.

Therefore, the task of "teaching a person to read" is not set. The one who knows how to read, in his head, harmful thoughts, the same gender sweat will not let him lie. Without evaluation, because Bulgakov, no matter how you evaluate - he just is, and that’s it. The critic gives his nightmare comments everywhere in the text! The master is of course a masterpiece, but depressed to the impossibility.

A graduate student’s comment is terrible. The author did not understand what the novel is about in general. He seriously considers Bulgakov the author at the level of the middle Mangaki, which gives every thought in direct text. And he considers the thought expressed by one of the heroes the main thought of the work. The fact that the work does not support this idea in any way and in the overwhelming part speaks of something else does not bother him.

A lot of interesting thoughts. But, IMHO, you forgot to clarify that those generations have taught to read - parents and friends, and not a literature teacher. But tell me - and what works should be held in the 6th grade, when the girls are already ripe, and the boys - no? And they are interested in completely different things. And "teach a person to read books. This graduate student believes that it is necessary to read not a master, but his comments on the master.

And you would not cost the retelling of the text. It was necessary to retell the teacher. Classic classics are discord. And the wrapping of young Buratin has nothing to do with it. What kind of ridiculous nonsense? What, nafig, Buratin, can be toned with war and the world, a thunderstorm play, or there fathers and children, crime and punishment? What such ideological standards are laid there?

Does someone pull Buratin from the Cherry Garden? Are there ideological standards in Mtsyri? In the undergrowth and the hero of our time, of course, you can see some ideological standards, they say, there I show the nobles from the non -shy side, and the auditor generally ridicules the royal regime. But the problem is, Andrei Franz, that both the hero and the hero and the auditor were each time a bomb, the most prominent phenomenon in Russian culture.

And for this reason they are included in the school curriculum. It is impossible to throw them out of Russian culture. If they have a disgust for reading, I'm sorry. You were not lucky with a teacher of Russian literature, however, obviously, with your aplomb, read your self -conceit, you still laid the bolt on it, and did not listen to Nifiga, taking out only aversion to literature from school.

Literature lessons at school are disgusted and weaned from reading, but for another reason. It is not clear which Dolboyb invented to include works designed for adults in the school curriculum. And this insanity lasts ten years and the end to the edge is not visible. Well, as sorry, to explain the problem of fathers and children to the student if Turgenev addressed this book to the fathers in the first place?

Do we have fathers at a desk? You will understand the conflict of generations only when your children are 20 years old, and experience in your own skin. Pechorin, disappointed in life, is a schoolboy, is disappointed in life? Have you seen such a schoolboy anywhere? This is designed for a middle -aged crisis, at Lermontov he came earlier than ours, because then people grew up earlier, there was a time.

Almost no one lived to 50, after 40 the old man is already, the ruin. It is not the point, but Pechorin will understand our contemporaries from 30 and older, but give him to schoolchildren. The cherry garden is even more for older people. There is an era and people who have not fitted in the new era. This is closer to summer people in general, who feel on the sidelines of life, the young go forward, but the rest is insulting, they try to pretend that they walk in the leg, and they themselves look at the world, which is absolutely alien to them.

The auditor will finally become clear when you work with officials, and preferably, you yourself will serve in any Russian state institution. Well nothing has changed. The schoolboy did not see this and does not know. Explain to the teenager why Catherine drowned at Ostrovsky, if the early sexual ties are already normal, and career growth and enrichment with the help of the genitals have become the norm?

A schoolgirl who already had several cases of sex and are proud of this will understand Catherine?They perceive it as a fool, nothing more. And the tragedy of a thunderstorm through the eyes of a modern schoolboy lies in the fact that punitive psychiatry with the injection of haloperidol did not reach Catherine in time. Hence the student’s rejection of literature as a class.

Some come to great literature after school. Most never come. They just do not know that it is. For them, this is something tedious, painful, stupid, stupid. Our graduates stupidly do not know how to read. Then they know the words of the letter and know how to add words, with errors, but at least somehow. The school is not dull. And they do not know how to read. This is the main mistake and the main disaster of modern society.

I will say banality, but through books people become smarter, cleaner, kinder. There is no smart person who does not know how to read. It can be cunning, dexterous, vile, unscrupulous, due to this successful in life, but smart - no. He is stupid and controlled. Although it can be rich. Due to the instinct of money -grubbing. I am deeply convinced that both Tryndets X and the modern nightmare in Ukraine, where in the midst of, in fact, a fratricidal war, this is all because people do not know how to read.

This has grown a generation of undersivethered. For example: why were troops withdrawn from Afghanistan? Yes, because the protest in society was so strong that the entire ideological machine of the USSR could not be in person, for which he needed to kill those very Afghans. Why are we fighting there? This question, finally, sounded so loudly that the troops were forced to withdraw.

And now - why are you killing Ukrainians? Sikilev and Solovyov on TV told me that it was necessary. Well, what else to talk about. With all the shortcomings of the country, Soviet people in its years were immunity to all kinds of ideology and advertising. They were read, and all agitation and propaganda left them, like water from a goose. That is why the union collapsed.

Otherwise, the Secretary Generals would calmly sit on bayonets to this day. But the Capstans have long understood where the wind was blowing, and that the simple Yankee or Jhanbul education is not only useless, but contraindicated. And then he thinks about any naughty bad. Let all sorts of avatars look better than transformers. The school was to teach to read.

So, as she teaches to count, for example. No one introduces quantum physics and geometry of Lobachevsky at school. Give primary skills, and then, if a person wants. But in the teaching of literature, another approach will contribute. Metaphorically expressed, to a person who has learned to count on sticks yesterday, they immediately give differential equations.